My dystopian vision of where AI storytelling could go
Throw-away stories and đ± "good enough" to sell
Iâm not afraid of âAIâ writing better stories than writers.
There have been moments where that has been a fear, but the more I write about the differences between âAIâ and human writers, the more comfort I have and I donât see that happening.
But I am afraid of 2 other things that will affect writers.
People creating their own content
People creating enough âgood enoughâ stories with âAIâ tools
Personal Content
First, imagine someone canât find quite the story they are looking for, or they loved a book and want a sequel that doesnât exist or a small twist to that story. Maybe they want a steam punk version of Harry Potter or a cozy mystery version of Harry and Hermoineâs married life.
That doesnât exist and probably never will due to copyright.
But if LLMs get good enough (theyâre probably close enough now) that person could generate their own story just the way they like it.
And hereâs the kicker.
Theyâre not going to try to sell it. Thatâs not the issue.
They read it, and then âŠÂ just throw it away đ±
Thatâs what Iâm scared about.
What if our readers donât need us as much?
What if our readers make their own unique story and then dump it?
Mass âGood Enoughâ Stories
Now hereâs my second fear.
What if writersâor worse yet, people who arenât really writersâstart pumping out stories that are âgood enough.â
What does âgood enoughâ mean?
Good enough to get someone to buy it.
Good enough to get a reader to read it.
Good enough to make money.
Devoid of true culture, emotion, life, and people.
If thatâs the case, good enough might become the new normal.
Readers will come to expect that. They wonât read anything more difficult, dense, or âporousâ like it says in Fahrenheit 451.
AI creators will make more content like that to sell.
AI will be trained on âgood enoughâ content.
This starts a slow spiral to more and more culturally bankrupt stories.
And all this is even before we have actual AI. Itâs just the fake âAIâ LLMs that we have today.
So then the real AI is trained on the low-quality stories of the day (whenever or if ever AGI happens).
Iâm not trying to scare anyone.
Itâs just a scenario I see playing out in my head which will probably never happen the way I imagine it.
I just want to encourage every writer out there to strive for better than âgood enoughâ AI-written stories, or even âgood enoughâ human-written stories, or even âgood enoughâ AI-assisted stories.
We are the pillars of society.
We are the foundation and keepers of culture, the observers of humanity, the teachers of life and people.
Hold the line and strive for more than âgood enough.â
The dynamic landscape of publishing may find an unexpected catalyst in Amazon, rather than traditional authors. Recent developments hint at an intriguing shift: Amazon prompts authors to disclose the use of AI in their books upon submission. This move has sparked speculation within the writing community. Some fear Amazon is amassing data to exclude AI-assisted authors, while others suspect the retail giant is nurturing its own language models to produce content for direct publication on KDP.
Imagine a scenario where not just individual authors, but major publishing entities or Amazon itself, begin to mass-produce narratives that are merely satisfactory. The potential for Amazon to leverage AI in scrutinizing submissions for AI-generated content, only to prioritize its own publications, presents a chilling prospect. Owning the distribution channels, Amazon could manipulate discoverability and promote its AI-generated works aggressively, all while leveraging its vast customer base for targeted marketing through newsletters and manipulated rankings. Talk about a dystopian future.
But I'm not worried about that. Because I don't believe that the machine can compete with me. The essence of storytelling remains beyond the reach of any computer. Despite the possibility of AI producing content at an unprecedented scale, it can't write real stories from the soul. I have faith that no matter what "good enough" content is published quality will persevere, transcending the allure of "good enough" content, no matter how prolifically it is generated.